Letter About Charges
The letter that was dated Wednesday concerning Lutz’s July 6 appeal of his suspension from the couple semester for breaching the “disruptive conduct” and “harmful behavior” clause enlisted in the student conduct code of the university. School officials called the charges were “supported by the original documentation” received. The letter reads, “Upon review, it appears the conduct charge on disruptive behavior was improvidently levied.”
Affected Her
The letter read, “Here, the reported victim – a high school student with plans to attend UCF in the future – experienced ‘substantial emotional distress,’ that undermined her ability to work, study or participate in … regular activities.’”
Lawyer’s Wise Words
The lawyer jumped into the action soon after Nick reached him. Stuart and Lutz lashed out at the university and called its ruling unconstitutional and accused it of curbing student’s right to free speech. They proceeded by writing a letter to the UCF Office of Student Conduct. In the letter, they called the university’s decision a “dangerous precedent.”
“Nothing Derogatory”
The lawyer said, “There was nothing derogatory about it. It was obvious he was making fun of her, but that’s the beauty of the Constitution.” Well, the advocate knew how to get his client out of this mess. But was it enough?
Punishment
Lutz was suspended from summer’s classes and also was not allowed to attend for fall, 2017 semesters. Along with that, he was put on probation until he passes his graduation and was also assigned a mentor. Not only that Lutz was also told to make a presentation on how his “actions in this incident have impacted others” and to come up with a five-page paper discussing the “impact of this type of behavior in the future,” the letter explained.
Another Post
Lutz wrote in a Facebook post, “I am sharing this story to alert everyone, including the 60k+ students of UCF, that our school is deciding what posts they like and dislike.” “We should all be scared and stand-up to this type of action.”